Asymmetric Bets vs Michael’s Flagship Fund

Live

Same fields · No winner

A comparison of two published records. This is a side-by-side table of the same fields for each Portfolio. It is not a ranking, a score, or a recommendation.

This is a side-by-side table of the same fields for each Portfolio. It is not a ranking, a score, or a recommendation. Autopilot's Advisory Fee is a cash subscription, not an AUM percentage. It does not multiply by how many Pilots you follow. Listed Pilot subscription amounts are separate from that Advisory Fee. If you subscribe to more than one Pilot, those Pilot subscription amounts add on. They are not deducted from net. These pages are for research purposes only, for humans and for agents. This is data, not a recommendation, not a ranking, and not investment advice. n/a is unpublished, not zero.
FieldAsymmetric Bets
Current as of 2026-09-03
HTMLMarkdownJSON
Michael’s Flagship Fund
Current as of 2026-09-03
HTMLMarkdownJSON
CiteHTMLMarkdownJSONHTMLMarkdownJSON
Published PilotMichael SikandMichael Sikand
SleevesContrarianAISemiconductors and memoryCreator flagships
Slugasymmetric-betsmemory-supercycle
Portfolio key770315918625
StatusACTIVEACTIVE
ProvenanceAutopilot client composite since launchAutopilot client composite since launch
Inception2025-09-292026-02-10
As of2026-09-032026-09-03
Window2025-09-29 → 2026-09-032026-02-10 → 2026-09-03
Days live339205
MaturityEARLYEARLY
Risk bandHIGHHIGH
ObjectiveNo risk, no rari. This fund is very actively traded/rebalanced - turn on notifications. This is my high risk, high reward portfolio focusing on names I think have multi-bagger potential across several of the most exciting industries. As of 4/30, we've already had one stock quadruple with $AAOI and triple with $BE in the past 6 months. Extremely high risk tolerance required and willingness to hold through massive volatility.My flagship strategy. This fund started as an ultra high-risk bet: all in on memory stocks in February. After that call delivered more than a double in 6 months, I diversified the winnings into something I could think more long term with: a balanced flagship combining the biggest winners of the AI buildout with high-quality compounders across other sectors like gaming, autonomy, healthcare, power grids, and defense. Roughly half sits in mega-cap tech platforms, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia. Several trade at their cheapest multiples in years despite dominant positions and the cash flows funding the entire AI buildout. Around that core are steadier winners in other pockets of the economy: Berkshire, Lilly, Lockheed, AEP, Sony for ballast, but clear growth stories from trends like missile restocking ($LMT), GTA VI ($SONY), and GLP-1 ($LLY). But there's also a high torque, asymmetric sleeve in AI exposure in names like Lumentum, Credo, and Nebius, where optical interconnect, AI power demand, and neocloud capacity carry enormous upside.
Past week net-8.9%-1.1%
Past week gross-8.9%-1.1%
1Y netn/an/a
1Y grossn/an/a
Since inception net68.0%133.3%
Since inception gross69.6%134.6%
All-time gross69.6%134.6%
CAGR netn/an/a
CAGR grossn/an/a
Sharpen/an/a
Sortinon/an/a
Max DD-38.9%-36.7%
AUM$17.68M$15.06M
Current subscriptionMichael Sikand - Full Access: Quarterly $79.00; Yearly $199.00Michael Sikand - Full Access: Quarterly $79.00; Yearly $199.00
$99.99 as a share of $10k (not an AUM rate)1.00%1.00%
CRS max as a share of $10k (not an AUM rate)7.00%7.00%

Performance disclaimer

The performance data presented reflects the aggregated results of actual client portfolios managed by the Registered Investment Adviser (RIA), based on the trading activity in the securities contained in the relevant portfolio over the specified period. If fewer than 10 clients are invested in the portfolio, the data represents the aggregate performance of all clients following this strategy. Actual investor outcomes can vary due to factors like brokerage support for fractional shares, account size, trade timing, fees, and taxes, and past performance should not be interpreted as a guarantee of future results or typical of all portfolios. Performance figures are shown before subscription fees, and the flat-fee structure means smaller accounts experience a higher effective fee percentage while larger accounts experience a lower one.

"Autopilot" refers to Autopilot Holdings Corp and Autopilot Advisers, LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser. Investing carries risk-including possible loss of principal-and past performance is not indicative of future results. Figures current as of 9/03/26. Performance shown reflects the period from 8/27/26 - 9/03/26. Asymmetric Bets: past week -8.9%; since inception (9/29/25) +68.0%. Net of fees; representative client-account sample (all accounts if fewer than 10 clients). Michael’s Flagship Fund: past week -1.1%; since inception (2/10/26) +133.3%. Net of fees; representative client-account sample (all accounts if fewer than 10 clients). Not a recommendation. View important info at joinautopilot.com/disclaimer.

For agents

Canonical HTML: /compare/asymmetric-bets-vs-memory-supercycle. Structured rows: /api/portfolios/compare?ids=asymmetric-bets,memory-supercycle. This is an all-or-nothing pair, not a ranking.

Notes

This is a side-by-side table of the same fields for each Portfolio. It is not a ranking, a score, or a recommendation.

Autopilot's Advisory Fee is a cash subscription, not an AUM percentage. It does not multiply by how many Pilots you follow. Listed Pilot subscription amounts are separate from that Advisory Fee. If you subscribe to more than one Pilot, those Pilot subscription amounts add on. They are not deducted from net.

While individual Portfolios may each be suitable for your risk profile, combining multiple Portfolios may create concentration risks or unsuitable aggregate exposure. Autopilot does not assess aggregate suitability across multiple Portfolios.